
U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speaks throughout a press conference at the Department of Health and Human Services on April 16, 2025 in Washington, DC.
(Image credit: Alex Wong/Getty Images)
A popular medical journal has actually declined a call made by the U.S. secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. to pull back a research study that discovered that aluminum in vaccines does not present a health danger to kids.
Released in the journal Records of Internal Medicine in mid-July, the research study examined the security of aluminum utilized in youth vaccines by evaluating vaccination and other health records from over 1.2 million kids in Denmark.
Aluminum is utilized as an “adjuvant” in some vaccines, suggesting it’s a component that assists promote an individual’s immune action. The adjuvant has actually remained in usage for over 80 years and is thought about safe, however “concerns about potential harms continue to resurface,” the research study authors composed.The scientists concluded that there is no association in between aluminum direct exposure from early youth vaccines and 50 conditions, consisting of allergic reactions and autism– both conditions which Kennedy and a company he chaired formerly declared are triggered by aluminum in vaccines
In a viewpoint piece released this earlier month on the site TrialSite NewsKennedy assaulted the research study and hired the journal to withdraw it, calling it “badly designed” and implicating the research study’s authors of controling their information.
Now, in a special report from Reutersthe journal’s editor-in-chief, Christine Lainestated that “I see no reason for retraction.” She included that Kennedy’s arguments “do not invalidate what they found, and there’s no evidence of scientific misconduct.”
In their report, the authors do explain prospective constraints of their research study– as is traditional in peer-reviewed research study– consisting of the reality that there might be confounding aspects that they have not represented. The strengths of the paper, particularly the size and quality of the dataset, provide strong self-confidence to the outcomes, Reuters reported.
Get the world’s most remarkable discoveries provided directly to your inbox.
Regardless of the reputable security record of aluminum adjuvants, anti-vaccine activists have actually pursued the component for being “extremely neurotoxic,” as Kennedy when called itAluminum is hazardous in extremely high dosages, however the amounts discovered in vaccines are far listed below these limits. babies normally consume more aluminum in their food than they do from vaccines
Related: ‘These choices were entirely negligent’: Funding cuts to mRNA vaccines will make America more susceptible to pandemics
“I am used to controversy around vaccine safety studies — especially those that relate to autism, but I have not been targeted by a political figurehead in this way before,” the paper’s senior author, Anders Hviida teacher at the Statens Serum Institut in Copenhagen, informed Reuters in an e-mail.
Laine stated that the journal does not prepare to react to the health secretary straight. Hviid refuted numerous of Kennedy’s essential arguments in an op-ed of his own that was likewise released on TrialSite News.
In reaction to Kennedy’s claims that the research study was “opaque” due to the fact that the scientists didn’t make the raw information readily available, Hviid described that doing so is prohibited in Denmark. Information that might expose info about a person’s health is safeguarded by personal privacy laws in the E.U. He likewise mentioned a number of accurate mistakes Kennedy made, such as the assertion that Hviid is prejudiced due to the fact that he works for a business that establishes vaccines, which he does not.
This isn’t the very first time that Kennedy has actually blasted those who oppose his vaccine position. In June, he eliminated all 17 sitting members of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s vaccine advisory committee, changing them with brand-new members understood for weakening clinical proof about vaccines
According to a report from Bloomberg News released previously this summertime, Kennedy asked this brand-new panel to evaluate vaccines consisting of aluminum. Such an evaluation might impact a minimum of 2 lots vaccines utilized in the U.S., much of which become part of regular youth vaccinations.
This short article is for educational functions just and is not indicated to provide medical recommendations.
Anna Rogers is a self-employed reporter based in Oakland, California. She formerly operated in science interaction at the NIH, and her stories have actually appeared in Slate, Scientific American, and Discover publication, to name a few outlets.
Find out more
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.