
Unsealed messages include wrinkle to trial after United States consented to settle with Live Nation.
Credit: Getty Images|Bloomberg
Recently unsealed files reveal that a Live Nation local director took pride in gouging ticket purchasers and “robbing them blind” with charges for secondary services such as small upgrades to parking.
Live Nation has actually attempted to omit Slack messages from a trial that looks for a separation of Live Nation and its Ticketmaster subsidiary, declaring the messages are unimportant to the case, “extremely prejudicial,” and would “irritate the jury.” The United States federal government and state attorney generals of the United States opposed the movement to leave out proof. United States District Judge Arun Subramanian of the Southern District of New York hasn’t ruled on the movement yet, however bought the files unsealed the other day.
Live Nation has actually promoted the experiences it uses concertgoers at amphitheaters however looked for “to leave out honest, internal messages in which the person who is presently Head of Ticketing for these amphitheaters calls fans ‘so foolish,’ describes that he ‘gouge[s]them, and boasts that Live Nation is ‘robbing them blind, child,'” stated a memorandum of law submitted by the United States and states.
The messages were “sent out in between Live Nation workers Ben Baker and Jeff Weinhold on the work environment partnership tool called Slack,” the memorandum stated. The “robbing them blind” message was sent out by Baker.
“As of 2022 (when the majority of the messages were sent out), Mr. Baker was a local Director of Ticketing for locations consisting of Live Nation’s MidFlorida Credit Union Amphitheatre (a significant show location),” the short stated. “Mr. Weinhold was likewise a local Director of Ticketing for locations consisting of Jiffy Lube Live (another significant performance location). Mr. Baker is now Head of Ticketing for Venue Nation (the part of Live Nation accountable for running its amphitheaters), and Mr. Weinhold is a Senior Director of Ticketing for Live Nation’s Capital Region.”
United States settlement tosses trial into doubt
The short stated that “Live Nation’s extreme rates for secondary services,” like those taken pride in the internal messages, “are straight appropriate to Plaintiffs’ claims” concerning how “Live Nation monetizes its monopoly position in the amphitheater market.”
The trial itself might be stopped and rebooted at a later date since the Trump administration chose to settle with Live Nation and Ticketmaster. The United States and states submitted their movement to leave out the proof on March 8, the very same day that the United States and Live Nation notified the court of a proposed settlement.
The US/Live Nation settlement blindsided state attorney generals of the United States, who have actually stated they plan to take control of the lead function in prosecuting the case. State AGs slammed the settlement terms and requested a mistrial to provide time to get ready for a brand-new trial. The judge apparently advised the state AGs and Live Nation to hold settlement talks and to be prepared to continue the trial next week if they do not reach a settlement.
The displays that Live Nation wished to leave out were published on the court docket the other day. “I charge $50 to park in the lawn lmao,” stated a 2022 message from Baker. “I charge $60 for closer lawn.”
Baker composed, “parking alone I did practically $200K more than 2019 … with LESS programs.” He shared an image that revealed a boost in leading parking income from $499,415 in 2019 to $666,230 in 2021 and included, “robbing them blind infant … that’s how we do.” Weinhold responded, “lol.”
“I gouge them on ancil rates”
Baker grumbled that a Dead & & Company cancellation avoided him from taking 2nd location in a sales competitors. “Gim me a plaque dammit,” he composed. In a conversation about ticket costs and promos, Baker composed, “I gouge them on ancil rates to offset it.”
Weinhold composed in another chat, “I have VIP parking approximately $250 lol.” Baker responded, “I practically feel bad benefiting from them.” Weinhold then pointed out that he raised club costs to $125 and Baker responded, “I question if I can get $225.”
Live Nation stated the messages aren’t reflective of the business’s basic operations. “The Slack exchange from one junior staffer to a pal definitely does not show our worths or how we run,” Live Nation stated in a declaration offered to Ars today. “Because this was a personal Slack message, management discovered of this when the general public did, and will be checking out the matter without delay. Our service just works when fans have fantastic experiences, which is why we’ve topped amphitheater location charges at 15 percent and have actually invested $1 billion in the last 18 months into United States locations and fan features.”
The United States and states stated Live Nation is minimizing Baker’s position at the business. “Defendants’ quick stops working to discuss this person has actually considering that been promoted and now works as Head of Ticketing for Venue Nation, with obligations connecting to all of Live Nation’s places,” the complainants’ short stated.
Live Nation stated in a March 8 filing that the messages aren’t pertinent to the trial since they worried charges for things like VIP club gain access to, leading parking, or yard chair leasings. “These items are not main show tickets, are offered independently from tickets, and are not part of the ticketing services markets at concern in this trial; they bear no importance to the celebrations’ claims and defenses,” Live Nation informed the court.
Live Nation: Messages might “irritate the jury”
Live Nation stated the only function of utilizing the displays as proof “is to depict Defendants in an uncomplimentary light and irritate the jury versus Defendants,” which the exhibitions “would puzzle and deceive the jury, welcome decision-making on an inappropriate psychological basis, and trigger unjust bias to Defendants.” The business likewise asked the court to bar complainants “from questioning Ben Baker or any other witness about the compound of these Exhibits or about comparable interactions worrying secondary, fan-facing services and products not included by the markets and claims continuing to trial.”
The quick from United States and states stated the messages about secondary costs are extremely pertinent. The short stated the ancillaries “consist of centers charges that Live Nation troubles fans as part of the ticket cost, parts of service costs that Live Nation troubles fans in addition to the ticket rate, and Live Nation’s sale of ‘onsite’ services, such as updated parking and access to the VIP lounge.”
The short stated that Live Nation boasted in its most current yearly report that supplementary income was over $45 per fan for the year, which “Live Nation CEO Michael Rapino has actually pointed out ‘onsite’ supplementary sales [as] a ‘high margin company’ made it possible for by Live Nation’s scale.”
Live Nation’s argument that secondary services are unimportant to trial concerns about show tickets “totally misses out on the point,” the complainants stated. “The reality that Live Nation utilizes the high-margin supplementary organization to generate income from the amphitheater monopoly at concern in this case suffices by itself to show importance. Second, Live Nation has the ability to deteriorate the fan experience by charging extreme rates for supplementary services without worry of artists changing away, which shows its monopoly power in the amphitheater market.”
Urging the judge to permit the chats as proof, the quick stated the messages “offer crucial context and insight to the jury of how Defendants in reality run their organizations, possibly contrary to the statement the witness might offer in the courtroom.”
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom market, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, high speed customer affairs, lawsuit, and federal government policy of the tech market.
87 Comments
Find out more
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.








