After pushing ABC to suspend Jimmy Kimmel, Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr is setting his regulative sights on ABC’s The View and NBC late-night hosts Seth Meyers and Jimmy Fallon.

Carr appeared the other day on the radio program hosted by Scott Jennings, who explains himself as “the last man standing athwart the liberal mob.” Jennings asked Carr whether The View and other ABC programs breach FCC guidelines, and made a referral to President Trump getting in touch with NBC to cancel Fallon and Meyers.

“A lot of people think there are other shows on ABC that maybe run afoul of this more often than Jimmy Kimmel,” Jennings stated. “I’m thinking specifically of The View, and President Trump himself has mentioned Jimmy Fallon and Seth Meyers at NBC. Do you have comments on those shows, and are they doing what Kimmel did Monday night, and is it even worse on those programs in your opinion?”

In reaction, Carr went over the FCC’s Equal Opportunities Rule, likewise referred to as the Equal Time Rule, and stated the FCC might figure out that those programs do not receive an exemption to the guideline.

“When you look at these other TV shows, what’s interesting is the FCC does have a rule called the Equal Opportunity Rule, which means, for instance, if you’re in the run-up to an election and you have one partisan elected official on, you have to give equal time, equal opportunity, to the opposing partisan politician,” Carr stated.

At another point in the interview, Carr stated broadcasters that challenge FCC enforcement “can turn your license in to the FCC, we’ll find something else to do with it.”

Authentic news exemption

Carr stated the FCC hasn’t formerly imposed the guideline on those programs since of an exemption for “bona fide news” programs. He stated the FCC might identify the programs discussed by Jennings aren’t exempt:

There’s an exception to that guideline called the authentic news exception, which suggests if you are an authentic news program, you do not need to follow the Equal Opportunity Rule. Throughout the years, the FCC has actually established a body of case law on that has actually recommended that the majority of these late night programs, aside from SNLare authentic news programs. I would presume you might make the argument that The View is an authentic news program however I’m not so sure about that, and I believe it’s beneficial to have the FCC check out whether The View and a few of these other programs you have still certify as authentic news programs and [are] Exempt from the Equal Opportunity routine that Congress has actually put in location.

The Equal Opportunity Rule uses to radio and television broadcast stations with FCC licenses to utilize the airwaves. An FCC truth sheet discusses that stations providing time to one prospect should supply “comparable time and placement to opposing candidates” upon demand. The onus is on prospects to demand broadcast–“the station is not required to seek out opposing legally qualified candidates and offer them Equal Opportunities,” the truth sheet states.

The exemption discussed by Carr implies that “appearances by legally qualified candidates on bona fide newscasts, interview programs, certain types of news documentaries, and during on-the-spot coverage of bona fide news events are exempt from Equal Opportunities,” the truth sheet states.

In 1994, the FCC stated that “Congress removed the inhibiting effect of the equal opportunities obligation upon bona fide news programming to encourage increased news coverage of political campaign activity.” Congress offered the FCC freedom to translate the scope of authentic news exemptions.

Describing its 1988 judgment on Home entertainment Tonight and Home entertainment This Weekthe FCC stated it discovered that “the principal consideration should be ‘whether the program reports news of some area of current events… in a manner similar to more traditional newscasts.’ The Commission has thus declined to evaluate the relative quality or significance of the topics and stories selected for newscast coverage, relying instead on the broadcaster’s good faith news judgment.”

Carr’s claims

Carr declared in November 2024 that NBC putting Kamala Harris on Saturday Night Live before the election was “a clear and blatant effort to evade the FCC’s Equal Time rule.” NBC offered Trump 2 totally free 60-second messages in order to comply with the guideline.

Carr didn’t point out any particular events on The View or late-night programs that would breach the FCC guideline. The View Has actually resolved its efforts to get Trump on the program. Executive Producer Brian Teta informed Deadline in April 2024, “We’ve invited Trump to join us at the table for both 2016 and 2020 elections, and he declined, and at a certain point, we stopped asking. So I don’t anticipate that changing. I think he’s pretty familiar with how the co-hosts feel about him and doesn’t see himself coming here.”

The Kimmel debate emerged over a monologue in which he stated, “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterize this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them and with everything they can to score political points from it.”

With implicated killer Tyler Robinson being referred to as having liberal views, Carr and other conservatives declared that Kimmel misguided audiences. Carr appeared on conservative analyst Benny Johnson’s podcast on Wednesday and stated, “We can do this the easy way or the hard way. These companies can find ways to change conduct, to take action, frankly on Kimmel, or there’s going to be additional work for the FCC ahead.”

Nexstar and Sinclair, 2 significant owners of television stations, both prompted ABC to act versus Kimmel and stated their stations would not air his program. The pressure from broadcasters is taking place at a time when both Nexstar and ABC owner Disney are looking for Trump administration approval for mergers.

Democrats implicate Carr of hypocrisy on First Amendment

Anna Gomez, the only Democrat on the Republican-majority FCC, stated the other day that Carr violated his authority, however “billion-dollar companies with pending business before the agency” are “vulnerable to pressure to bend to the government’s ideological demands.”

Democratic legislators slammed Carr and proposed examinations into the chair for abuse of authority. “It is not simply unacceptable for the FCC chairman to threaten a media organization because he does not like the content of its programming—it violates the First Amendment that you claim to champion,” Senate Democrats composed in a letter to Carr. “The FCC’s role in overseeing the public airwaves does not give it the power to act as a roving press censor, targeting broadcasters based on their political commentary. But under your leadership, the FCC is being weaponized to do precisely that.”

Democrats indicated a few of Carr’s previous declarations in which he decried federal government censorship. Throughout his 2023 re-confirmation procedures, Senate Democrats asked Carr about social networks posts in which he implicated Democrats of participating in censorship like “what you’d see in the Soviet Union.”

“I posted those tweets in the context of expressing my view on the First Amendment that debate on matters of public interest should be robust, uninhibited, and wide open,” Carr composed in his action to Democratic senators. “I believe that the best remedy to speech that someone does not like or finds objectionable is more speech. I posted them because I believe that a newsroom’s decision about what stories to cover and how to frame them should, consistent with the First Amendment, be beyond the reach of any government official.”

Years previously, in 2019, Carr published a tweet that stated, “Should the government censor speech it doesn’t like? Of course not. The FCC does not have a roving mandate to police speech in the name of the ‘public interest.'”

Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) likewise slammed Carr’s technique, stating it would cause the exact same strategies being utilized versus Republicans the next time Democrats are in power.

Carr to broadcasters: Give your licenses back to FCC

Carr stated today he’s just attending to certified broadcasters, which have public-interest commitments, instead of cable television and streaming services that do not require FCC licenses. Network programs itself does not require an FCC license, however the television stations that bring network programs need licenses.

Carr attempted to cast Kimmel’s suspension as the outcome of natural pressure from certified broadcasters, instead of FCC browbeating. “There’s no untoward coercion happening here,” Carr informed Jennings. “The market was intended to function this way, where local TV stations get to push back.”

Television station owners did so in precisely the method that Carr prompted them to. “The individual licensed stations that are taking their content, it’s time for them to step up and say this garbage isn’t something that we think serves the needs of our local communities,” Carr stated on Johnson’s podcast. Carr stated that Kimmel’s monologue “appears to be some of the sickest conduct possible.”

On the Jennings program, Carr declared that Democrats in the previous administration carried out “a two-tiered weaponized system of justice,” which his FCC is rather offering everybody “a fair shake and even-handed treatment.”

Carr has actually consistently threatened broadcasters with the FCC’s seldom enforced news distortion policy. As we’ve discussed, the FCC technically has no guideline or policy versus news distortion, which is why it is called a policy and not a guideline. On Jennings’ program, he explained it as a guideline.

389 Comments