As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
(Image credit: Courtesy of David Bustos/White Sands National Park)
The age of “rarely preserved” ancient human footprints dotting the landscape at White Sands National Park in New Mexico has actually been fiercely discussed for several years. Now, a brand-new research study has actually discovered that these footprints actually are around 23,000 years of ages– however the date isn’t accepted by everybody.
If the 23,000-year-old age is precise, it would imply that human beings remained in North America around the peak of the Last Glacial Maximum, the coldest part of the last glacial epoch — far earlier than archaeologists had actually formerly believed.
In the brand-new research study, the scientists radiocarbon-dated natural sediment in core samples from the website, which offered dates for the footprints in addition to for the whole paleolake and river system that as soon as existed there. The analysis was performed in laboratories unaffiliated with earlier research studies.
“Our data supports the original data” that dated the website to 23,000 years earlier, research study very first author Vance Hollidaya teacher emeritus of sociology and geosciences at the University of Arizona, informed Live Science. “Plus, we now have an idea of what the landscape was like when people were out there.”
The legend of dating the approximately 60 footprints returns to 2021, when a research study reported the discovery of the footprints and dated them to in between 21,000 and 23,000 years of agesA 2022 rebuttal differed with utilizing the seeds of ditch turf (Ruppia cirrhosaa water plant, for radiocarbon dating. Water plants get their carbon from undersea, which can be much older than carbon from the environment. This can alter the levels of carbon 14, a radioactive variation of the atom, in the samples, making the plants appear older than they actually are.
In 2023, scientists redated the website with optically promoted luminescence (OSL) dating, which exposed when quartz or feldspar grains in the tracks were last exposed to sunshine, and radiocarbon dating of ancient conifer pollen from the footprint layer– which showed to be another method to utilize carbon 14 without depending on water plants.
Related: The 1st Americans were not who we believed they were
Get the world’s most remarkable discoveries provided directly to your inbox.
Once again, the researchers discovered that the footprints were 21,000 to 23,000 years of ages. While some researchers called the outcomes “very convincing,” others, consisting of those who composed the 2022 counterclaim, were still careful of the outcomes, stating the samples weren’t drawn from the best layer.
Now, the brand-new research study uses more proof that the footprints date to the Last Glacial Maximum, when the location was a large wetland occupied by glacial epoch animals. The footprints likely originated from hunter-gatherers who got here in the Americas after taking a trip along the Bering Land Bridgewhich linked Siberia and Alaska when water level were lower, research study recommends
For years, scientists believed the earliest Americans were the Clovis, who resided in North America around 13,000 years agoThe footprint discovery and others are gradually exposing that Indigenous individuals reached the Americas much earlier than believed.
A view of Gypsum Overlook near the White Sands dunes that has actually functions dated to around 22,000 years earlier. Throughout the last glacial epoch, this location had streams and sat near the ancient Lake Otero. (Image credit: Photo by Vance Holliday)
A makeover at White Sands
Holliday has actually been operating at White Sands given that 2012, and a few of his information was utilized in the initial 2021 research study, making him a co-author, he kept in mind. This time, Holliday and his associates radiocarbon-dated mud cores from the website. They discovered that the trackways date to in between 20,700 and 22,400 years earlier, which carefully matches the initial dates.
When combined, there are now an overall of 55 radiocarbon-dated samples of mud, seeds and pollen from the footprint layer that support the 21,000- to 23,000-year-old dates, Holliday stated.
Ancient human footprints are “so rarely preserved,” he stated. And now, researchers have “dates on three different materials that all coincide” on a time for these tracks.
“You get to the point where it’s really hard to explain all this away,” he stated in a declaration “As I say in the paper, it would be serendipity in the extreme to have all these dates giving you a consistent picture that’s in error.”
More work is required to firmly date the footprints at White Sands, stated Michael Watersdirector of the Center for the Study of the First Americans at Texas A&M University, who was not included with the research study.
“Even with these new data, I remain concerned about the radiocarbon ages generated to date the footprints at White Sands,” Waters informed Live Science in an e-mail. He restated the recognized Ruppia problem, stating the radiocarbon dates “are likely too old” since the plant got its carbon from the water. The exact same undersea carbon problems might have likewise impacted the sediments dated in the brand-new research study, he stated.
“The new ages on bulk organic sediments presented in this paper are interesting, but it is unclear about the origin of the carbon being dated,” Waters stated.
Holliday and his coworkers acknowledge that their research study does not deal with another hot-button problem: Where are the artifacts or settlements from these ice age individuals at White Sands?
That concern stays to be addressed, Holliday stated. It’s not likely that hunter-gatherers would have left behind important products in the brief time it took them to travel around the wetland.
“These people live by their artifacts, and they were far away from where they can get replacement material,” Holliday stated in the declaration. “They’re not just randomly dropping artifacts. It’s not logical to me that you’re going to see a debris field.”
Laura is the archaeology and Life’s Little Mysteries editor at Live Science. She likewise reports on basic science, consisting of paleontology. Her work has actually appeared in The New York Times, Scholastic, Popular Science and Spectrum, a website on autism research study. She has actually won numerous awards from the Society of Professional Journalists and the Washington Newspaper Publishers Association for her reporting at a weekly paper near Seattle. Laura holds a bachelor’s degree in English literature and psychology from Washington University in St. Louis and a master’s degree in science composing from NYU.
Find out more
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
