United States Department of Justice attorney Isaac Belfer argued that Kennedy has the broad authority to make all of the modifications he has actually currently made and more. He declared that the AAP and other medical groups were asking the court to “monitor vaccine policy forever.”

United States District Judge Brian Murphy managing the case in Boston appeared hesitant of the recommendation that Kennedy has apparently unlimited authority over federal vaccine policy.

“Is it your position that [Kennedy] is completely unreviewable?” Murphy asked Belfer, according to Reuters. “If the secretary stated rather of getting a shot to avoid measles I believe you should get a shot that offers you measles, is that unreviewable?”

“Yes,” Belfer responded.

Belfer, arguing on behalf of the Department of Health and Human Services, stated the medical companies were simply looking for to utilize the courts to enact their preferred vaccine policy. The attorney for the groups, James Oh, countered that the vaccine policy modifications– which were not brought out with common procedures and do not have supporting clinical proof– were done incorrectly and without reasoned decision-making.

Kennedy’s vaccine policy modifications are the “actions of somebody who thinks he can do whatever he desires,” Oh stated, according to Stat News.

Murphy showed he would provide a judgment on the injunction before the CDC vaccine consultants prepare to satisfy on March 18, calling it a “tough due date.”