Memories aren’t static in the brain — they ‘drift’ over time

Memories aren’t static in the brain — they ‘drift’ over time

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Woodworking Plans Banner

A mouse research study discovers that, while some cells associated with saving memories of locations remain steady, lots of “drift” gradually.
(Image credit: imaginima by means of Getty Images)

Memories of locations “drift” throughout the brain as they are brought by various sets of nerve cells in time, a brand-new research study in mice recommends.

Historically, neuroscientists believed that memories of areas and functions of our instant environment were encoded by particular “place cells.” These location cells, situated in an essential memory center called the hippocampusilluminate when a mammal goes into the particular environment they represent– state, the door to a home or a waterfall on a treking path. It was believed that the activation of these location cells served as a sort of map in the brain by encoding long lasting memories of particular locations in addition to allowing navigation.

“Going back to the 1960s and 1970s, we basically thought that [spatial] memories were encoded by specific neurons in the brain,” stated senior research study author Daniel Dombecka teacher and primary detective of neurobiology at Northwestern University. “That was the thought for probably 30, 40 years — until about 10 years ago.”

In 2013, a paper in the journal Nature Neuroscience stirred some debate and “blew everyone’s mind,” Dombeck stated. The research study used more recent methods to probe cells in the mouse hippocampus, exposing that the brain’s representation of locations wasn’t almost as constant as when believed. Some cells regularly reactivated when mice were gone back to a labyrinth once again and once again, however in general, the group of active nerve cells changed. Instead of being a fixed “mental map,” these spatial representations altered over the weeks-long experiment.

This phenomenon became referred to as “hippocampal representational drift,” The concept fulfilled some pushback. Some researchers questioned whether the shifts in brain activity were in fact connected to modifications in the mice’s environments– possibly the smells or sounds in the labyrinth varied in between rounds of the experiment, or the rodents moved through the labyrinth more gradually or rapidly in a provided round.

In their brand-new research study, released Wednesday (July 23) in the journal NatureDombeck and his group set out to manage those rowdy variables, and they did so utilizing virtual truth and a small treadmill.

Related: Can your brain lack memory?

Get the world’s most remarkable discoveries provided directly to your inbox.

In each round of the experiment, the mice were put on a treadmill surrounded by screens. Similar to a computer game controller, the treadmill served as an avenue for the mice to check out a virtual labyrinth, which was precisely the exact same each time. The group might then straight compare the trials where the mice ran the very same speed, hence removing that irregularity.

In addition, a cone was put over each rodent’s nose to pump in the exact same aroma throughout every round, and white sound was played in the background to stabilize the acoustic landscape.

As the mice browsed the virtual labyrinth, the scientists kept track of the activity of their hippocampal cells in genuine time. They did this by opening a physical window into the brain and presenting a compound that shone when brain cells were triggered. They might then monitor this radiance under a microscopic lense. This setup does not restrict the durability of the laboratory mice, so they might run the experiment once again and once again throughout the research study, Dombeck kept in mind.

By managing the environment so firmly, “I was sure we were going to reduce this representational drift,” he informed Live Science. “I was sure that the memory was going to look more stable over days — and that’s not what we found.”

The group observed that just a little subset of cells– around 5% to 10% of those tape-recorded– acted like standard location cells, illuminating regularly in each round. These steady cells were likewise the most excitable general, implying they were most likely to fire in reaction to a stimulus. The group might forecast which cells were least most likely to wander based on their level of excitability. The less-excitable cells were much more susceptible to wander.

Why does this drift happen? “It might be a mechanism that the brain uses to separate highly similar experiences into discrete individual memories so that we could access them separately later,” Dombeck recommended. Although you may return to a location consistently– work, school or a preferred park– you can nevertheless differentiate the various check outs in your mind.

To put it simply, the drift might be a method for the brain to track the passage of time, he stated.

Dombeck believes this kind of drift impacts episodic memoriesin basic, which have to do with particular individual experiences that happened at specific places and times. Other kinds of memory– such as motor memoriesabout discovered motion abilities– might be represented in a different way in the brain.

The research study had a couple of constraints. For one, the brain-recording technique utilized in the research study recorded just a portion of the cells in the mouse hippocampus– possibly 1% of its numerous countless nerve cells. Based on previous research studies, the group believes comparable procedures are happening throughout the hippocampus.

In addition, research study in mice isn’t ensured to use to people. Dombeck stated he would anticipate the procedures observed in this mouse research study to be “fairly similar” to those unfolding in the human hippocampus. Since cells of the hippocampus ended up being less excitable with age, it might be that memory gets worse with age in part due to the fact that those couple of steady cells at the core of our memories lose excitability, Dombeck recommended.

“If we could somehow tweak the excitability of our neurons or maintain that excitability over time, we could probably maintain memory,” Dombeck hypothesized. That concept will require to be backed up with additional research study.

Nicoletta Lanese is the health channel editor at Live Science and was formerly a news editor and personnel author at the website. She holds a graduate certificate in science interaction from UC Santa Cruz and degrees in neuroscience and dance from the University of Florida. Her work has actually appeared in The Scientist, Science News, the Mercury News, Mongabay and Stanford Medicine Magazine, to name a few outlets. Based in NYC, she likewise stays greatly associated with dance and carries out in regional choreographers’ work.

Find out more

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

About the Author: tech