As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
While tyrannosaurid dinosaurs like Tyrannosaurus rex had skulls that were enhanced for high bite forces, other massive meat-eating dinosaurs such as megalosauroids and allosauroids had much weaker bites and rather focused on slashing and ripping flesh, according to an analysis by University of Bristol paleontologists.
Tyrannosaurus rexholotype specimen at the Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, the United States. Image credit: Scott Robert Anselmo/ CC BY-SA 3.0.
” Carnivorous dinosaurs took extremely various courses as they developed into giants in regards to feeding biomechanics and possible habits,” stated Dr. Andrew Rowe, a paleontologist at the University of Bristol.
“Tyrannosaurs developed skulls constructed for strength and squashing bites, while other family trees had relatively weaker however more specific skulls, recommending a variety of feeding techniques even at enormous sizes.”
“In other words, there wasn’t one ‘finest’ skull style for being a predatory giant; a number of styles worked completely well.”
Dr. Rowe and his coworker, Dr. Emily Rayfield, needed to know how bipedalism affected skull biomechanics and feeding strategies.
It was formerly understood that in spite of reaching comparable sizes, predatory dinosaurs progressed in really various parts of the world at various times and had extremely various skull shapes.
Those truths raised concerns about whether their skulls were functionally comparable under the surface area or if there were noteworthy distinctions in their predatory way of lives.
To take a look at the relationship in between body size and skull biomechanics, the authors utilized 3D innovations consisting of CT scans and surface area scans examine the skull mechanics, measure the feeding efficiency, and determine the bite strength throughout 18 types of therapod, a group of meat-eating dinosaurs varying from little to giant.
While they anticipated some distinctions in between types, they were shocked when their analyses revealed clear biomechanical divergence.
“Tyrannosaurids like Tyrannosaurus rexhad skulls that were enhanced for high bite forces at the expense of greater skull tension,” Dr. Rowe stated.
“But in some other giants, like Giganotosauruswe determined tension patterns recommending a reasonably lighter bite.”
“It drove home how development can produce several services to life as a big, meat-eating biped.”
Skull tension didn’t reveal a pattern of boost with size. Some smaller sized therapods experienced higher tension than some bigger types due to increased muscle volume and bite forces.
The findings reveal that being a predatory biped didn’t constantly relate to being a bone-crushing giant.
Unlike Tyrannosaurus rex some dinosaurs, consisting of the spinosaurs and allosaurs, ended up being giants while keeping weaker bites more matched for slashing at victim and removing flesh.
“I tend to compareAllosaurusto a contemporary Komodo dragon in regards to feeding design,” Dr. Rowe stated.
“Large tyrannosaur skulls were rather enhanced like contemporary crocodiles with high bite forces that squashed victim.”
“This biomechanical variety recommends that dinosaur communities supported a broader series of huge predator ecologies than we frequently presume, with less competitors and more expertise.”
The research study appears today in the journalExisting Biology
_____
Andre J. Rowe & & Emily J. Rayfield. 2025. Meat-eating dinosaur family trees embrace various skull efficiencies at enormous size.Existing Biology35 (15 ): 3664-3673; doi: 10.1016/ j.cub.2025.06.051
Learn more
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
