Whatever we see around us, from the ground below our feet to the most remote galaxies, is made from matter. For researchers, that has actually long postured an issue: According to physicists’ finest existing theories, matter and its equivalent, antimatter, should have actually been produced in equivalent quantities at the time of the Big Bang. Antimatter is vanishingly unusual in the universe. What occurred?

Physicists do not understand the response to that concern yet, however lots of believe the service should include some subtle distinction in the manner in which matter and antimatter act. And today, the most appealing course into that uncharted area centers on brand-new experiments including the strange subatomic particle referred to as the neutrino.

“It’s not to state that neutrinos are certainly the description of the matter-antimatter asymmetry, however a huge class of designs that can describe this asymmetry are linked to neutrinos,” states Jessica Turner, a theoretical physicist at Durham University in the United Kingdom.

Let’s support for a minute: When physicists discuss matter, that’s simply the common things that deep space is made from– primarily protons and neutrons (that make up the nuclei of atoms), in addition to lighter particles like electrons. The term “antimatter” has a sci-fi ring to it, antimatter is not all that various from normal matter. Generally, the only distinction is electrical charge: For example, the positron– the very first antimatter particle to be found– matches an electron in its mass however brings a favorable instead of an unfavorable charge. (Things are a bit more made complex with electrically neutral particles. A photon is thought about to be its own antiparticle, however an antineutron is unique from a neutron in that it’s made up of antiquarks rather than common quarks.)

Numerous antimatter particles can exist in nature; they take place in cosmic rays and in thunderclouds, and are produced by particular sort of radioactive decay. (Because individuals– and bananas– include a percentage of radioactive potassium, they release small quantities of antimatter in the type of positrons.)

Percentages of antimatter have actually likewise been developed by researchers in particle accelerators and other experiments, at terrific effort and cost– detering sci-fi imagine rockets moved by antimatter or planet-destroying weapons stimulated by it.

When matter and antimatter satisfy, they wipe out, launching energy in the type of radiation. Such encounters are governed by Einstein’s popular formula, E=mc²— energy equates to mass times the square of the speed of light– which states you can transform a bit of matter into a great deal of energy, or vice versa. (The positrons given off by bananas and bodies have so little mass that we do not discover the tiny quantities of energy launched when they obliterate.) Since matter and antimatter obliterate so easily, it’s difficult to make a piece of antimatter much larger than an atom, though in theory you might have whatever from antimatter particles to antimatter worlds and stars.

There’s a puzzle: If matter and antimatter were produced in equivalent quantities at the time of the Big Bang, as theory recommends, should not they have obliterated, leaving a universe made up of pure energy? Why exists any matter left?

Physicists’ finest guess is that some procedure in the early universe preferred the production of matter compared to the production of antimatter– however precisely what that procedure was is a secret, and the concern of why we reside in a matter-dominated universe is among the most vexing issues in all of physics.

Most importantly, physicists have not had the ability to think about any such procedure that would fit together with today’s leading theory of matter and energy, called the Standard Model of particle physics. That leaves theorists looking for originalities, some as-yet-unknown physics that surpasses the Standard Model. This is where neutrinos are available in.

A neutral response

Neutrinos are small particles with no electrical charge. (The name equates as “little neutral one.”) According to the Standard Model, they should be massless, like photons, however experiments starting in the 1990s revealed that they carry out in reality have a small mass. (They’re at least a million times lighter than electrons, the severe lightweights amongst regular matter.) Considering that physicists currently understand that neutrinos break the Standard Model by having mass, their hope is that discovering more about these small particles may yield insights into whatever lies beyond.

Neutrinos have actually been sluggish to yield their tricks, nevertheless, since they hardly communicate with other particles. About 60 billion neutrinos from the Sun travel through every square centimeter of your skin each second. If those neutrinos engaged with the atoms in our bodies, they would most likely damage us. Rather, they pass right through. “You probably will not connect with a single neutrino in your life time,” states Pedro Machado, a physicist at Fermilab near Chicago. “It’s so not likely.”

Experiments, nevertheless, have actually revealed that neutrinos “oscillate” as they take a trip, changing amongst 3 various identities– physicists call them “tastes”: electron neutrino, muon neutrino, and tau neutrino. Oscillation measurements have actually likewise exposed that different-flavored neutrinos have a little various masses.

Neutrino oscillation is unusual, however it might be odd in a helpful method, due to the fact that it may permit physicists to penetrate particular basic proportions in nature– and these in turn might brighten the most uncomfortable of asymmetries, specifically deep space’s matter-antimatter imbalance.

For neutrino scientists, a crucial proportion is called charge-parity or CP proportion. It’s really a mix of 2 unique balances: Changing a particle’s charge turns matter into antimatter (or vice versa), while altering a particle’s parity turns a particle into its mirror image (like turning a right-handed glove into a left-handed glove). The CP-opposite variation of a particle of common matter is a mirror image of the matching antiparticle. Does this opposite particle act precisely the exact same as the initial one? If not, physicists state that CP proportion is breached– an elegant method of stating that matter and antimatter act a little in a different way from one another. Any examples of CP balance offense in nature might assist to describe the matter-antimatter imbalance.

CP infraction has actually currently been observed in some mesons, a type of subatomic particle generally made up of one quark and one antiquark, an unexpected outcome initially discovered in the 1960s. It’s an incredibly little impact, and it falls far brief of being able to account for the universe’s matter-antimatter asymmetry.

In July 2025, researchers operating at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN near Geneva reported clear proof for a comparable offense by one kind of particle from a various household of subatomic particles called baryons– however this freshly observed CP infraction is likewise thought to be much too little to represent the matter-antimatter imbalance.

Experiments on the horizon

What about neutrinos? Do they break CP proportion– and if so, do they do it in a huge sufficient method to discuss why we reside in a matter-dominated universe? This is specifically the concern being dealt with by a brand-new generation of particle physics experiments. The majority of enthusiastic amongst them is the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE), which is now under building and construction in the United States; information collection might start as early as 2029.

DUNE will use the world’s most extreme neutrino beam, which will fire both neutrinos and antineutrinos from Fermilab to the Sanford Underground Research Facility, situated 800 miles away in South Dakota. (There’s no tunnel; the neutrinos and antineutrinos just zip through the earth, for the a lot of part barely discovering that it’s there.) Detectors at each end of the beam will expose how the particles oscillate as they pass through the range in between the 2 laboratories– and whether the habits of the neutrinos varies from that of the antineutrinos.

DUNE will not select the accurate quantity of neutrinos’ CP balance offense (if there is any), however it will set a ceiling on it. The bigger the possible impact, the higher the disparity in the habits of neutrinos versus antineutrinos, and the higher the probability that neutrinos might be accountable for the matter-antimatter asymmetry in the early universe.

For Shirley Li, a physicist at the University of California, Irvine, the concern of neutrino CP offense is an immediate concern, one that might point the method to a significant rethink of particle physics. “If I might have one concern responded to by the end of my life time, I would wish to know what that’s about,” she states.

Aside from being a significant discovery in its own right, CP balance offense in neutrinos might challenge the Standard Model by pointing the method to other unique physics. Theorists state it would imply there might be 2 kinds of neutrinos– left-handed ones (the regular light-weight ones observed to date) and much heavier right-handed neutrinos, which are so far simply a theoretical possibility. (The particles’ “handedness” describes their quantum homes.)

These right-handed neutrinos might be as much as 10¹⁵ times much heavier than protons, and they ‘d be unsteady, rotting nearly immediately after originating. They’re not discovered in today’s universe, physicists think that right-handed neutrinos might have existed in the minutes after the Big Bang– potentially decomposing by means of a procedure that imitated CP infraction and preferred the development of matter over antimatter.

43 Comments