FCC boss Brendan Carr claims another victory over DEI as AT&T drops

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Avoid to content

AT&T implicated of “monetary play to curry favor” with Trump administration.

FCC Chairman Brendan Carr talks at the MWC (Mobile World Congress) in Barcelona on March 3, 2025.

Credit: Getty Images|Lluis Gene

AT&T informed the Federal Communications Commission that it has actually removed DEI (variety, equity, and addition) policies and programs, abiding by needs from Chairman Brendan Carr.

The FCC manager has actually declined to authorize mergers and other big deals including business that do not accept drop assistance for DEI. On Monday, AT&T submitted a letter disowning its previous DEI efforts in the FCC docket for its $1 billion purchase of United States Cellular spectrum licenses.

“We have actually carefully followed the current Executive Orders, Supreme Court judgments, and assistance provided by the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and have actually changed our work and company practices to make sure that they adhere to all relevant laws and associated requirements, consisting of ending DEI-related policies as explained listed below, not simply in name however in compound,” AT&T’s letter to Carr stated.

AT&T has actually individually made an application for FCC approval of a $23 billion offer to purchase spectrum licenses from EchoStar, and stated it requires Department of Justice approval for a $5.75 billion offer to purchase CenturyLink’s customer fiber broadband department.

Table of Contents

“Strategic monetary play to curry favor”

Carr commemorated AT&T’s letter with an X post. “AT&T has actually now memorialized its dedication to ending DEI-related policies in an FCC filing and ‘will not have any functions concentrated on DEI,'” he composed. Carr stated the AT&T letter “follows the huge modifications @robbystarbuck currently revealed previously this year,” describing AT&T dropping a number of programs in March after pressure from conservative activist Robby Starbuck.

FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, a Democrat, composed that “AT&T’s turnaround isn’t an unexpected improvement of worths, however a tactical monetary play to curry favor with this FCC/Administration. Business must keep in mind that deserting fairness and addition for short-term gain will be a stain to their track record long into the future.”

AT&T’s letter stated its “employing, training, and profession advancement chances are not and will not be based upon or restricted by race, gender, or other secured qualities,” which it “got rid of training associated to ‘variety, equity and addition’ in addition to any recommendations to it from our internal and external messaging.”

AT&T stated it will not utilize DEI in selecting providers, and it has actually “ceased sponsorships that are not lined up to our present service technique.” It has actually likewise ended worker studies that are “concentrated on safeguarded qualities.”

Carr got anti-DEI promises from numerous companies

Carr has actually made ending DEI the crucial requirement for business looking for deal approvals, exceeding other issues about offers that lower competitors in telecom markets. He formerly drawn out pledges to end DEI programs from Verizon, T-Mobile. and Skydance.

Verizon got approval for its purchase of Frontier after ending DEI and is still awaiting approval of a spectrum handle United States Cellular. T-Mobile got approval for its acquisition of United States Cellular’s cordless operations and spectrum and for a joint endeavor to obtain fiber company Metronet. Skydance got approval for an $8 billion merger with CBS owner Paramount after settling a claim submitted by President Trump for $16 million and consenting to enforce a “predisposition screen” at CBS to please a Carr need.

With local provider United States Cellular selling off its possessions to the 3 significant across the country providers, United States Assistant Attorney General Gail Slater of the Justice Department’s Antitrust Division grumbled in July that the offers “will combine yet more spectrum in the Big 3’s oligopoly, which manages more than 80 percent of the mobile cordless spectrum in the nation.” Regardless of that, the Justice Department chose to let T-Mobile finish its acquisition of United States Cellular’s cordless operations and a few of its spectrum.

While AT&T’s guarantee to end DEI will likely lead the way for more approvals, the AT&T/ United States Cellular offer is opposed by customer advocacy groups and some rivals.

Competitors and rate issues

One petition to reject the deal was submitted in April by numerous advocacy groups and the Communications Workers of America union, and another petition to reject was submitted at the exact same time by the Rural Wireless Association market lobby group.

United States Cellular “supplies rate competitors in the markets it serves,” while the huge 3 “providers have actually continued to raise costs on customers as they continue to demolish rivals,” the Rural Wireless Association stated. Costs will increase in the regional markets where United States Cellular would be gotten rid of as a rival, it stated. The AT&T/ United States Cellular offer consists of 3.45 GHz and 700 MHz licenses in 29 states, covering about 12 percent of the United States population.

“The proposed deal will increase rates for customers due to decreased competitors in many markets and limitation access to important spectrum for rural providers,” the rural cordless group stated. “This proposed deal, in mix with the proposed offers of T-Mobile and Verizon with United States Cellular, focuses essential spectrum amongst the across the country mobile cordless providers, broadening the competitors space in the market, making it exceptionally challenging for little rural incumbents and brand-new entrants to contend. The loss of United States Cellular as a mutual roaming partner in markets where AT&T is obtaining spectrum will increase wandering expenses and reduce strolling incomes for rural providers, to the point where the sustainability of their companies will be threatened.”

Cable television lobby group NCTA likewise grumbled in April that offering AT&T a waiver required to finish the United States Cellular offer “would press AT&T to the edge of– or beyond– longstanding spectrum limits in many markets, with broad ramifications for mid-band spectrum gain access to and cordless market structure across the country.” The AT&T and Verizon spectrum offers with United States Cellular are still pending, T-Mobile’s purchase of United States Cellular’s cordless service and other spectrum was finished in August.

Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom market, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, high speed broadband customer affairs, lawsuit, and federal government policy of the tech market.

57 Comments