As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Prometheus was a Titan, a god in the Ancient Greek pantheon. He was likewise a crook who took fire from Hephaestus, the blacksmith god. Concealing the fire in a stalk of fennel, Prometheus concerned earth and offered it to humankind. As penalty, he was chained to a mountain, where an eagle went to every day to consume his liver.

Prometheus’ present was not just the present of fire; it was the present of intelligence. In Prometheus Bound, he states that before his present human beings saw without seeing and heard without hearing. After his present, human beings might compose, construct homes, checked out the stars, carry out mathematics, domesticate animals, construct ships, create medications, analyze dreams and provide appropriate offerings to the gods.

The misconception of Prometheus is a development story with a distinction. In the Hebrew Bible, God does not offer Adam the power to produce life. Prometheus provides (some of) the gods’ innovative power to mankind.

Hesiod shows this element of the misconception in Theogony. In that poem, Zeus not just penalizes Prometheus for the theft of fire; he penalizes mankind. He purchases Hephaestus to fire up his create and build the very first lady, Pandora, who releases evil on the world.

The fire that Hephaestus utilizes to make Pandora is the very same fire that Prometheus has actually offered mankind.

In this 18th-century inscription, Prometheus constructs the very first guy. (Image credit: AnonymousUnknown author, Public domain, by means of Wikimedia Commons)The Greeks proposed the concept that human beings are a kind of expert system. Prometheus and Hephaestus utilize innovation to produce males and females. As historian Adrienne Mayor exposes in her book Gods and Robotsthe ancients typically portrayed Prometheus as an artisan, utilizing normal tools to produce people in a regular workshop.

If Prometheus provided us the fire of the gods, it would appear to follow that we can utilize this fire to make our own smart beings. Such stories are plentiful in Ancient Greek literature, from the innovator Daedalus, who produced statues that came to life, to the witch Medea, who might bring back youth and effectiveness with her shrewd drugs. Greek developers likewise built mechanical computer systems for astronomy and impressive moving figures powered by gravity, water and air

The Pope and the chatbot2,700 years have actually passed considering that Hesiod initially jotted down the story of Prometheus. In the taking place centuries, the misconception has actually been constantly retold, particularly because the publication of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein; or the Modern Prometheus in 1818.

The misconception is not constantly informed as fiction. Here are 2 historic examples where the misconception of Prometheus appeared to come real.

Gerbert of Aurillac was the Prometheus of the 10th century. He was born in the early 940s CE, went to school at Aurillac Abbeyand ended up being a monk himself. He continued to master every recognized branch of knowing. In the year 999, he was chosen Pope. He passed away in 1003 under his pontifical name, Sylvester II.

Rumours about Gerbert spread out extremely throughout Europe. Within a century of his death, his life had actually currently ended up being legend. Among the most popular legends, and the most important in our age of AI buzz, is that of Gerbert’s “brazen head.” The legend was informed in the 1120s by the English historian William of Malmesburyin his well looked into and extremely related to book, Deeds of the English Kings.

Gerbert was deeply found out in astronomy, a science of forecast. Astronomers might utilize the astrolabe to forecast the position of the stars and visualize cosmological occasions such as eclipses. According to William, Gerbert utilized his understanding of astronomy to build a talking head. After checking the motions of the stars and worlds, he cast a head in bronze that might address yes-or-no concerns.

Gerbert asked the head: “Will I become Pope?”

“Yes,” addressed the head.

Gerbert asked: “Will I die before I sing mass in Jerusalem?”

“No,” the head responded.

In both cases, the head was proper, though not as Gerbert prepared for. He did end up being Pope, and he smartly prevented going on expedition to Jerusalem. One day, nevertheless, he sang mass at Santa Croce in Gerusalemme in Rome. For Gerbert, Santa Croce in Gerusalemme was understood in those days merely as “Jerusalem.”

Gerbert sickened and passed away. On his deathbed, he asked his attendants to cut up his body and cast away the pieces, so he might go to his real master, Satan. In this method, he was, like Prometheus, penalized for his theft of fire.

Pope Sylvester II and the Devil (Image credit: Chronicon pontificum et imperatorum, Public domain, through Wikimedia Commons)It is an exhilarating story. It is unclear whether William of Malmesbury really thought it. He does attempt to convince his readers that it is possible. Why did this fantastic historian with a dedication to the reality insert some fanciful legends about a French pope into his history of England? Excellent concern!

Is it so fanciful to think that an innovative astronomer might develop a general-purpose forecast maker? In those days, astronomy was the most effective science of forecast. The sober and academic William was at least ready to captivate the concept that dazzling advances in astronomy may make it possible for a Pope to develop a smart chatbot.

Today, that exact same possibility is credited to machine-learning algorithms, which can anticipate which advertisement you will click, which film you will enjoy, which word you will type next. We can be forgiven for falling under the exact same spell.

The anatomist and the robotThe Prometheus of the 18th century was Jacques de Vaucanson, a minimum of according to Voltaire:

Strong Vaucanson, competitor of Prometheus, Seems, mimicing the springs of nature, To take the fire of paradise to stimulate the body.

Jacques de Vaucanson– Joseph Boze( 1784 ) (Image credit: Joseph Boze, Public domain, through Wikimedia Commons)Vaucanson was a fantastic machinist, popular for his robotThese were clockwork gadgets that reasonably simulated human or animal anatomy. Thinkers of the time thought that the body was a maker– so why could not a machinist construct one?

Often Vaucanson’s robot were clinically substantial. He built a piper, for instance, that had lips and lungs and fingers, and blew the pipeline in similar method a human would. Historian Jessica Riskin discusses in her book The Restless Clock that Vaucanson needed to make substantial discoveries in acoustics in order to make his piper play in tune.

Often his robot were less clinical. His absorbing duck was extremely popular, however ended up being deceptive. It appeared to consume and absorb food, however its poos remained in reality premade pellets concealed inside the system.

Vaucanson invested years dealing with what he called a “moving anatomy.” In 1741, he provided a strategy to the Lyons Academy to develop an “imitation of all animal operations.” Twenty years later on, he was at it once again. He protected assistance from King Louis XV to construct a simulation of the circulatory system. He declared he might develop a total, living synthetic body.

3 of Vaucanson’s popular robot: the Flute Player, the Digesting Duck, and the Provençal Farmer, who played the pipeline and tambourine. (Image credit: See page for author, Public domain, through Wikimedia Commons)There is no proof that Vaucanson ever finished an entire body. In the end, he could not measure up to the buzz. Numerous of his contemporaries thought he might do it. They desired to think in his wonderful systems. They wanted he would take the fire of life.If Vaucanson could make a brand-new body, could not he likewise fix an existing one? This is the guarantee of some AI business today. According to Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, AI will quickly permit individuals “to live as long as they want.” Immortality looks like an appealing financial investment.

Sylvester II and Vaucanson were terrific technologists, however neither was a Prometheus. They took no fire from the gods. Will the striving Prometheans of Silicon Valley be successful where their predecessors have stopped working? If just we had Sylvester II’s brazen head, we might ask it.

This edited short article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Check out the initial short article

Michael Falk is a literary scholar by training, and a developer by fascination. He links these 2 sides of his operate in 2 methods. The very first method: He utilizes calculation to unweave literary texts, and find stunning patterns in their words. The 2nd method: He utilizes literature to unweave calculation, making use of the abundant resources of literary custom to comprehend the nature and function of software application.

You need to verify your show and tell name before commenting

Please logout and after that login once again, you will then be triggered to enter your screen name.

Learn more