How did the Concorde fly so fast?

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Concorde airplanes might speed up to faster than the speed of noise, leaving a loud sonic boom in their wake.
(Image credit: NNehring through Getty Images )

The Concorde guest jet set a record when it flew in between New York City and London in 2 hours, 52 minutes, 59 secondsThe supersonic airplane might fly at more than two times the speed of noise. Simply how quick was this airplane, and what made it so fast?

The jet, which flew from 1976 to 2003, had a launch speed of 250 miles per hour(402 km/h)and a typical travelling speed of 1,350 miles per hour( 2,173 km/h ). In contrast, a Boeing 737-700among the most typical plane designs flown nowadays, has a departure speed of 173 miles per hour (278 km/h )and a travelling speed of 514 miles per hour(828 km/h).

To accomplish high speeds, Concorde engineers required to create a craft that might manage both low-speed situations, such as launch and landing, in addition to supersonic travelling speeds, Tony Farinaan accessory assistant teacher of air travel engineering at Embry‑Riddle Aeronautical University in Florida, informed Live Science in an e-mail.

“A wing designed for efficient performance supersonically is typically very poor at providing the lift needed at slow speeds when taking off and landing,” Farina stated. To lower drag, supersonic wings are usually thinner and more swept back, Farina stated, compared to basic wings which are thicker to more quickly supply lift.

Offering lift was particularly essential due to the fact that the much faster an airplane goes, the more drag force it experiences, stated Bob van der Lindenan aeronautics manager at the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum in Washington, D.C. Essentially, much faster airplane experience more forces that oppose lift.

Related: Can an industrial plane do a snap roll?

One method Concorde engineers resolved this issue was by developing an airplane with a streamlined body, Farina stated, consisting of a narrow traveler cabin and extended tail cone. Engineers likewise utilized a delta wing, a wing profile that’s normally scheduled for fighter jets, van der Linden stated.

Get the world’s most remarkable discoveries provided directly to your inbox.

“The delta wing had very good high-speed characteristics, as well as very fine low-speed characteristics,” he informed Live Science.

The Concorde had a “droop nose,” nicknamed the “droop snoot,” which assisted the pilot see their environments throughout departure and landing. (Image credit: travelview through Getty Images)

This triangle-shaped wing style worked to decrease drag on the airplane, however it did present an intriguing style peculiarity. Due to the fact that of the airplane’s body shape, Concorde jets required to land with their nose angled greater into the air than a conventional industrial airliner. This made it extremely hard for pilots to see where they were going, van der Linden stated.

“They actually had to devise a way for the nose to go down [mechanically],” he stated. “In the business, we call this a ‘droop snoot.'”

Supersonic airplane developed today are now preventing this concern utilizing innovation that the Concorde didn’t have access to when it was developed in the 1960s, Farina stated.

“Under development now, the Boom Supersonic XB-1 aircraft uses an augmented vision system (cameras and screens) to avoid the need for drooping the nose,” Farina stated.

In addition to having a streamlined style, Concorde jets were powered by 4 turbo jet engines that separately produced 18.7 lots of thrust and burned almost 7,000 gallons (26,000 liters) of jet fuel per hour. In contrast, the Boeing 737-800 usages 850 gallons (3,200 liters) of jet fuel per hour.

The Concorde likewise increased the thrust developed by its engines, utilizing a gadget called an afterburner, van der Linden stated.

“Afterburners are really used on fighter jets or very-high-speed bombers, and what it does is simply dump raw fuel into the exhaust flame,” he stated. “It pushes the aircraft forward even faster, but your fuel consumption rate goes through the roof.”

Eventually, it was the fuel expense connected with the Concorde that made it a business failure, van der Linden stated. Other occurrences, consisting of the deadly Air France Flight 4590 crash in 2000, made matters worse.

“It is a gorgeous airplane,” van der Linden stated. “But to keep it that fast, you need a lot of power. Power means a lot of fuel, and a lot of fuel means a bigger price.”

Sarah is a D.C.-based independent science reporter thinking about the philosophical concerns of science and innovation and how research study intersects with our every day lives. Her work has actually appeared in Popular Mechanics, IEEE Spectrum, Inverse, and Nature, to name a few outlets, and covers subjects varying from AI to particle physics and area travel. She has a master’s degree in science journalism from Boston University.