QLED television producers have actually dug themselves into a hole.

After years of business assuring that their quantum dot light-emitting diode TVs utilize quantum dots( QDs) to improve color, some market watchers and customers have actually just recently begun questioning whether QLED TVs utilize QDs at all. Claims have actually been submitted, implicating business like TCL of utilizing deceptive language about whether their QLED TVs really utilize QDs.

In this short article, we’ll break down why brand-new conspiracy theories about QLED TVs are most likely overblown. We’ll likewise check out why deceptive marketing from television brand names is accountable for client doubt and how all of it sets a bad precedent for the future of high-end display screens, consisting of OLED TVs and screens.

What QLED TVs are expected to do

Televisions that utilize QDs are expected to deal broader color ranges and enhanced brightness over their QD-less LCD-LED equivalents. Simply ask Samsung, which states that QLED shows provide “a broader series of colors,” “much better color protection,” and “a brighter image.” TCL will inform you that its QLED TVs utilize “billions of Quantum Dot nanocrystals” and provide “industry-leading color combination and brightness.”

To be clear, appropriately made QD TVs that utilize an enough amount of QDs are legitimate. Outstanding examples, which command greater costs than QD-free competitors, effectively provide brilliant photos with large color ranges and outstanding color volume (the variety of colors a television display screens at numerous levels of brightness). A Television with strong color volume can portray numerous light and dark tones of green.

Innovation examines website RTINGS, which is understood for its thorough screen screening, describes that a television with great color volume makes “content look more realistic,” while “TVs with poor color volume don’t show as many details.” This is QLED’s huge selling point. A correct QLED television can be brighter than an OLED television and have considerably much better color volume than some high-end, non-QD LCD-LED screens.

Let’s have a look at some quality QLED TVs for a concept of where the color efficiency bar must be.

The 2024 Sony Bravia 9, for instance, is a $2,500 Mini LED Television with QDs. That’s pricey for a non-OLED television, however the Bravia 9 covers an excellent 92.35 percent of the DCI-P3 color area, per RTINGS’ screening. RTINGS tests color volume by comparing a screen’s Rec. 2020 protection to a television with a peak brightness of 10,000 nits. A “great worth,” the publication states, is over 30 percent. The Bravia 9 scored 54.4 percent.

Another well-performing QLED television is the 2024 Hisense U8. The Mini LED television has 96.27 percent DCI-P3 protection and 51.9 percent color volume, according to RTINGS.

Even older QLED TVs can impress. The Vizio M Series Quantum from 2020, for instance, has 99.18 percent DCI-P3 protection and 34 percent color volume, per RTINGS’ requirements.

Nowadays, television marketing most regularly points out QDs to recommend boosted color, however it’s ending up being progressively evident that some TVs marketed as utilizing QDs aren’t as vibrant as their QLED labels may recommend.

“QLED typically indicates exceptional colors, however some QLED designs have actually been reported to cover less than 90 percent of the DCI-P3 range,” Guillaume Chansin, associate director of screens and XR at Counterpoint Research, informed Ars Technica.

QD TVs implicated of not having QDs

Just recently, Samsung showed Ars evaluating arise from 3 TVs that TCL markets as QLEDs in the United States: the 65Q651G, 65Q681G, and 75Q651G. The TVs have particular MSRPs of $370, $480, and $550 since this writing.

Once again, TCL specifies QLED TVs as a “kind of LED/LCD that utilizes quantum dots to produce its display screen.”

“These quantum dots are nano-sized particles that discharge an unique colored light of their own when exposed to a source of light,” TCL states. The test results shared by Samsung recommend that the TVs in concern do not utilize cadmium or indium, 2 types of chemicals used in QD TVs. (You do not require both cadmium and indium for a set to be thought about a QD TELEVISION, and some QD TVs utilize a mix of cadmium and indium.)

Per the screening supplied by Samsung and carried out by Intertek, a London-headquartered screening and accreditation business, none of the evaluated TVs had sufficient cadmium to be spotted at a minimum detection requirement of 0.5 mg/kg. They likewise supposedly did not have enough indium for detection at a minimum requirement of 2 mg/kg. Intertek is stated to have actually checked each television set’s optical sheet, diffuser plate, and LED modules, with screening happening in the United States.

When grabbed remark about these outcomes, a TCL representative stated TCL “can not discuss specifics due to present lawsuits” however that it “supports [its] high-performance lineup, which offers uncompromised color precision.” TCL is dealing with a class-action grievance about its QLED TVs’ efficiency and usage of QDs.

TCL’s representative included:

TCL has conclusive substantiation for the claims made concerning its QLED tvs and will react to the lawsuits in due course. We stay dedicated to our clients and think in the exceptional quality and exceptional worth of our items. In the context of the continuous lawsuits, TCL will confirm that our industry-leading innovations fulfill or surpass the high bar that television audiences have actually concerned get out of us.

“This is bad for the market”

A maker not informing the reality about QDs in its TVs might be crippling to its credibility. A plan needing the production of phony, QD-less movies would be pricey– nearly as expensive as making genuine QD movies, Eric Virey, primary display screens expert at Yole Intelligence, formerly informed Ars.

What’s more than likely occurring is that the TVs in concern do utilize QDs for color– however they use less expensive phosphors to do a great deal of the heavy lifting, too. Even that description raises concerns around the principles of categorizing these TVs as QLED.

Counterpoint’s Chansin stated that the TCL television test results that Samsung shown Ars indicate the 3 TVs utilizing phosphors for color conversion “rather of quantum dots.”

He included:

While items that have trace quantities might be stated to “contain” quantum dots, it would be misinforming to state that these TVs are boosted by quantum dot innovation. Making use of the term “QLED” is rather more versatile, as it is a marketing term without any clear meaning. It is not unusual for a QLED Television to utilize a mix of quantum dots and phosphors.

Experts that I spoke to concurred that QD TVs that integrate QDs and phosphors are more typical amongst lower-priced TVs with low margins.

“Manufacturers have been trying to lower the concentration of quantum dots to cut costs, but we have now reached undetectable levels of quantum dots,” Chansin stated. “This is not good for the industry as a whole, and it will undermine consumers’ confidence in the products.”

Phosphors cultivating confusion

TCL TVs’ usage of phosphors in combination with QDs has actually been recorded before. In a 2024 video, Pete Palomaki, owner and chief researcher at QD specialist Palomaki Consulting, pried open TCL’s 55S555, a budget plan QLED television from 2022. Palomaki concluded that the television had actually QDs integrated within the diffuser instead of in the standalone optical movie. He likewise identified that a red phosphor called KSF and a green phosphor called beta sialon added to the television’s color.

In his video, Palomaki stated, “In the green spectrum, I get about less than 10 percent from the QD and the staying 90-plus percent from the phosphor.” Palomaki stated that about 75 percent of the television’s red recreation abilities originated from KSF, with the rest credited to QDs. Palomaki highlighted, however, that his breakdowns do not represent light recycling in the backlight system, which would most likely “increase up the contribution from the quantum dot.”

Palomaki didn’t clarify just how much more QD contribution might be anticipated and decreased to talk about this story.

Another video reveals an example of a TCL QLED television that Palomaki stated has phosphors around its LEDs however still utilizes QDs for most of color conversion.

TCL isn’t the only television brand name that depends on phosphors to enhance the color abilities of its QLED TVs– and most likely minimize producing expenses.

“There is a practically complete continuum of television styles, varying from utilizing just phosphors to utilizing just QDs, with any kind of mix in between,” Virey informed Ars.

Even Samsung, the business sobbing nasty over TCL’s absence of noticeable QDs, has actually supposedly utilized phosphors to deal with a few of the color work managed totally by QDs completely QD TVs. In 2023, Palomaki pulled apart a 2019 Samsung QN75Q7DRAF. He reported that the television’s color conversion leverages a “really low-cost” phosphor referred to as yttrium aluminum garnet (YAG), which is “not great for color range.”

A television utilizing QDs for color conversion must produce an optical spectrogram with narrow peak widths. As QD provider Avantama describes, “narrower bandwidths equate to purer colors with greater levels of effectiveness and vice versa.” In the QN75Q7DRAF’s optical spectrogram that Palomaki offered, you can see that the peaks are sharper and more narrow when determining the complete movie stack with the phosphors versus the QD movie alone. This assists show the television’s dependence on phosphors to improve color.

Ars asked Samsung to talk about using phosphors in its QD TVs, however we didn’t get a reaction.

Television brand names have actually ended up being familiar with slapping a QLED label on their TVs and believing that’s adequate to increase rates. It likewise appears that television makers are getting away with cutting down on QDs in exchange for phosphors of numerous levels of quality and with different efficiency ramifications.

It’s a frustrating circumstance for consumers who have actually purchased and depend on QLED TVs for upper-mid-range efficiency. It’s essential to stress that the usage of phosphors in QD TVs isn’t always a bad thing.

According to Virey:

There are a great deal of reasons display screen engineers may wish to utilize phosphors in combination with QDs. Having phosphors in a QD television does not always suggest low efficiency. It can supply a little increase in brightness, enhance homogeneity, and so on. Numerous kinds of phosphors can be utilized for various function. Phosphors are discovered in lots of high-performance– even flagship– screens.

Virey kept in mind that in cases where QLED TVs appear to have no noticeable QD material and sit at the lower end of a producer’s QD television offerings, “expense is plainly the motorist” for utilizing phosphors.

Much better screening, please

Why do not TCL and Samsung supply optical spectrograms of the TVs in concern to show whether or not color conversion is taking place as the producer claims? In September, TCL did supply a spectrogram, which it declared showed the existence of QDs in its TVs. It’s uncertain which design was checked, and the outcomes do not appear to deal with red or green. You can see TCL’s spectrogram here.

TCL decreased to talk about why it hasn’t supplied more screening outcomes, consisting of for its QLED TVs’ color range and precision. When Ars asked Samsung why it didn’t offer spectrograms or color range screening of TCL TVs, a business agent shared a declaration stating:

Quantum Dot innovation– and TVs that might be marketed as QLED– usually need either cadmium or indium as core parts. Intertek evaluated whether these active ingredients were present; their findings show that particular TCL TVs were discovered to do not have cadmium and indium.

Supplying more useful test outcomes would assist consumers much better comprehend what they can anticipate from a “QLED TELEVISION.” That level of information is missing from current allegations versus– and defenses of– QLED TVs. The kind of test results that have actually been shared, on the other hand, have actually been successful in providing higher shock worth.

In the interest of comprehending the real efficiency of among the TVs in concern, let’s rethink at the TCL 65Q651G that Samsung had Intertek test. The $370 65Q651G is called in lawsuits implicating TCL of lying about its QLED TVs.

RTINGS determined the television’s DCI-P3 protection at 88.3 percent and its color volume at 26.3 percent (once again, RTINGS thinks about anything above 30 percent on the latter “great”). Both numbers are actions down from the 99.2 percent DCI-P3 protection and 34 percent color volume that RTINGS taped for the 2020 Vizio M Series Quantum. It’s likewise less outstanding than TCL’s QM8, a Mini LED QLED television presently choosing $900. That television covers 94.59 percent of DCI-P3 and has a color volume of 49.2 percent, per RTINGS’ screening.

Growing suspicion

Possibly rather due to the very little schedule of reputable screening outcomes, customers are progressively suspicious about their QLED TVs and are taking their issues to court.

Samsung, relatively seeking to include fuel to the fire surrounding competitors like TCL, informed Ars that it utilized Intertek to check TCL TVs due to the fact that Intertek has actually been a “reliable resource for quality control and screening services for the market for more than a century.” Another most likely factor is the reality that Intertek formerly checked 3 other TCL TVs and concluded that they did not have products needed of QD TVs.

We covered those test leads to September. Hansol Chemical, a Seoul-headquartered chemical producer and supplier and Samsung provider, commissioned the screening of 3 TCL TVs offered beyond the United States: the C755, C655, and C655 Pro. In addition, Hansol employed Geneva-headquartered screening and accreditation business SGS. SGS likewise stopped working to discover indium at a minimum detection requirement of 5 mg/kg and cadmium at 0.5 mg/kg in the sets.

It’s essential to comprehend the capacity here for predisposition. Considering its relationship with Samsung and its status as a chaebol, Hansol stands to gain from discrediting TCL QD TVs. Even more, the South Korean federal government has actually supposedly revealed interest in the worldwide television market and pressed 2 other chaebols, Samsung and LG, to team up in order to keep market management over progressively competitive Chinese brand names like TCL. Thinking about Hansol’s ties to Samsung, Samsung’s competition with TCL, and the not likely idea of a business going through the effort of making phony QD movies for TVs, it’s reasonable to be hesitant about the Hansol-commissioned outcomes, in addition to the brand-new ones that Samsung provided.

Still, a claim (PDF) submitted on February 11 looking for class-action accreditation implicates TCL of “marketing its Q651G, Q672G, and A300W tvs as having quantum dot innovation when screening of the foregoing designs revealed that either: (i) the tvs do not have actually QLED innovation, or (ii) that if QLED innovation exists, it is not meaningfully adding to the efficiency or screen of the tvs, indicating that they must not be marketed as QLED tvs.” The problem is based upon the Intertek and SGS screening results offered in September.

Hisense is dealing with a suit implicating it of marketing QD-less TVs as QLED (PDF). “These models include, but are not necessarily limited to, the QD5 series, the QD6 series, QD65 series, the QD7 series, the U7 series, and the U7N series,” the suit, which is likewise looking for class-action accreditation, states.

Remarkably, the U7N called in the suit is among the most often advised QLED TVs from evaluations sites, consisting of RTINGS, Digital Trends, Tom’s Guide, and Ars sis website Wired. Per RTINGS’ screening, the television covers 94.14 percent of DCI-P3 and has a color volume of 37 percent. That’s great enough efficiency for it to be possible that the U7N utilizes someQDs, however without more screening, we can’t understand just how much of its color abilities are reliant on the innovation.

Both of the suits called above absence proof to show that the business are lying about utilizing QDs. The lawsuits shows growing consumer issue about getting deceived by QD Television makers. The grievances likewise expose crucial concerns about what sort of efficiency an item must provide before it can fairly use the QLED label.

A marketing-made mess

While some Arsians might enjoy digging into the various parts and chemicals driving display screen efficiency, the typical client does not truly appreciate what’s inside their television. What really affects television audiences’ lives is image quality and whether the television does what it declares.

LG provides us a fine example of QD-related television marketing that is most likely to puzzle buyers and might lead them to purchase a television that does not line up with their requirements. For several years, LG has actually been promoting TVs that utilize QNED, which the business states represent “quantum nano-emitting diode.” In marketing products viewable online, LG states QNED TVs utilize “small particles called quantum dots to boost colors and brightness on screens.”

It’s simple to see the capacity for confusion as consumers attempt to absorb the television market’s alphabet soup, that includes understanding the distinction in between the QNED and QLED marketing terms for QD TVs.

LG made things even more complicated in January when it revealed TVs that it calls QNED however which do not utilize QDs. Per LG’s statement of its 2025 QNED Evo lineup, the brand-new TVs utilize a “brand-new exclusive broad color range innovation, Dynamic QNED Color Solution, which changes quantum dots.”

LG declares its Dynamic QNED Color Solution “makes it possible for light from the backlight to be revealed in pure colors that are as sensible as they appear to the eye in basic life” which the TVs are “100 percent licensed by international screening and accreditation company Intertek for Color Volume, determining a screen’s capability to show the abundant colors of initial images without distortion.”

Without benchmark outcomes for specific Television designs or a complete understanding of what a “Dynamic QNED Color Solution” is, LG’s QNED marketing isn’t enough for setting reasonable expectations for the Television’s efficiency. And with QNED representing LG’s QD TVs for many years, it’s most likely that somebody will purchase a 2025 QNED television and believe that it has QDs.

Efficiency matters most

What ought to actually matter to a television audience is not the number of quantum dots a television has however how strong its image quality remains in contrast to the maker’s claims, the television’s rate, and the offered options. The market’s overuse of acronyms utilizing the letter “Q” and terms like “quantum” has actually made it hard to inform the efficiency capacity of so-called QD TVs.

105 Comments