‘An up-tempo version of Darwinian evolution’: How a mega freeze in Florida may have caused Burmese pythons to evolve at a blindingly fast speed

‘An up-tempo version of Darwinian evolution’: How a mega freeze in Florida may have caused Burmese pythons to evolve at a blindingly fast speed

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Woodworking Plans Banner

Just a subset of Florida’s Burmese python population endured a cold wave in January 2010.
(Image credit: Mark Conlin through Alamy)

Fifteen years earlier, a cold wave froze much of Florida’s wildlife to death– consisting of a number of the state’s intrusive Burmese pythons (Python bivittatus. In this excerpt from “Slither: How Nature’s Most Maligned Creatures Illuminate Our World” (Gand Central Publishing, 2025), science author Stephen Hall exposes that a subset of these pythons were genetically inclined to make it through the cold, setting the phase for fast development that might assist the intrusive snakes spread out even more into North America.


In early January 2010, a historical and extended deep freeze swept throughout the southeast United States, reaching all the method into the subtropical Everglades. Temperature levels hovered around 50 degrees Fahrenheit (10 degrees Celsius) for 48 hours; on Jan. 11, thermometers in South Florida dipped as low as 24.8 F (minus 4 C). Many people remember it, if at all, for the frozen iguanas that left of trees and pictures of citrus trees framed in icicleslike some fugitive Minnesota winter season carnival smuggled into the Deep South.

To wildlife and intrusive types professionals, the Big Freeze marked the start of the Big Unplanned Experiment.

The instant effect on the Burmese python population was clear. Carcasses of dead snakes cluttered roadways; frozen specimens showed up in underground burrows; further north in South Carolina, in the notorious “Where’s Waldo” python enclosure, all 10 snakes died throughout the local cold wave.

Scientist associated the mass die-off to “maladaptive behavior,” suggesting numerous snakes attempted to bask above ground in the sun regardless of the freezing temperature levels, instead of looking for thermal shelter in underground or marine burrows. Python “removals” — records by hunters, which worked as a rough indicator of the basic population– had actually peaked in 2009 in the national forest however dropped nearly five-fold in the following 2 or 3 years. It all looked like excellent news, at.

Population numbers were still doing not have, and “models” are still simply designs. Genes are where the rubber of biology fulfills the roadway of ecological difficulty, and this is when the geneticists got in the story. They were less thinking about the lots of snakes that had actually passed away, and more thinking about the couple of that had actually endured.

Like all snakes, Burmese pythons are ectotherms– they depend on heat from the environment since they do not create their own metabolic heat– so they need to establish biological techniques in their habits or in their physiological durability in the face of lethal cold to make it through freeze occasions that do not take place in their native variety. As the United States Geological Survey (USGS) introduction put it, “some portion of the southern Florida population survived” the 2010 occasion, “and these snakes and their offspring make up the current population.”

Get the world’s most remarkable discoveries provided directly to your inbox.

Temperature levels throughout the 2010 cold wave dropped so low, cold-blooded animals like iguanas were incapacitated and lost their grip while setting down on trees. ( Image credit: JUAN CASTRO/AFP by means of Getty Images)

By 2014, the variety of python eliminations in Everglades National Park had actually gone back to pre-freeze levels. In hereditary parlance, the 2010 freeze was a “bottleneck event” — just a couple of squeezed through and made it through. The ones that did, in the scriptural sense, went forth and increased.

Starting around the year 2015, numerous scientists studying python genomes to comprehend their metabolic process ended up being curious about the after results of the huge freeze. Daren Card and Todd Castoe of the University of Texas at Arlington coordinated with Maggie Hunter of the USGS workplace in Fort Lauderdale to try to find proof of what is called fast adjustment, which may be considered an up-tempo variation of Darwinian development

They took a look at the DNA of these survivor snakes to see if there were any hereditary hints regarding why particular pythons had the ability to endure a prolonged freeze; more specifically, they compared the DNA of pythons that lived before the freeze occasion with the DNA of pythons that had actually made it through to see if they might recognize any distinctions that may discuss the strength of the survivors at the molecular level.

The brief and troubling (although not conclusive) response was: yes.

It ends up that the survivors appeared to share hereditary modifications in locations of their genomes understood to manage thermoregulatory habits and metabolic process. “We saw a lot of things that just fortuitously overlapped with a lot of the same sorts of pathways and genes that we were studying in parallel, in a much more controlled fashion, using more lab experiments in Todd’s work on Burmese pythons,” Card informed me. “As we delved into them, we started to see a lot of genes that are involved in things like thermal tolerance.”

Burmese pythons indulge in the sun to remain warm, however this habits showed deadly for lots of snakes throughout the 2010 cold wave. (Image credit: Mark Conlin through Alamy)

The findings, released in 2018recommended that the survivors shared variations in their hereditary makeup that appeared to give higher cold tolerance and higher metabolic versatility– 2 characteristics that Castoe’s laboratory had actually been examining because 2011. These snakes were more likely behaviorally to look for shelter in underground refugia to outlive the cold– an excellent adjustment to the ecological truth of periodic freezes. And the metabolic modifications appeared to prefer a habits that motivated smaller sized and more regular meals– a great adjustment to the eco-friendly truth that, having actually currently annihilated populations of big mammals in the Everglades, the pythons may require to customize their diet plan.

This is not conclusive news– the research study was little, nobody (remarkably) has actually acted on it, and, as Card put it, scientists still just have a view from 30,000 feet of what occurred on the hereditary level in the pythons that made it through the Big Freeze. Whatever it is, the hereditary modifications– or, more properly, the choice for genes that boosted survival– appears to have actually occurred extremely rapidly. Which is, perhaps, really problem. It recommends that the pythons are on the relocation, genetically along with geographically.

The ramification is that the 2010 freeze served as a substantial choice occasion, as evolutionary biologists put it– an ecological tension so alarming, so severe, that it has the impact of quickly winnowing out people holding a bad hereditary hand and “selecting” the fortunate ones that hold winning hereditary hands.

The freeze chose out people that were vulnerable to cold temperature levels and picked people that had, at the hereditary level, some kind of cold-hardiness. Those genes were most likely given– right away, profligately and obviously, cryptically– to their numerous offspring.

The offspring of the making it through Burmese pythons most likely acquired their moms and dads’cold-adapted genes. (Image credit: McDonald Wildlife Photography Inc./ Getty Images)

The idea of fast adjustment in the Burmese python population in Florida once again opposes our standard concepts of development as a glacial procedure of hereditary choice and improvement that needs centuries, eons and geological dates. “We typically think of evolution as occurring over generally quite long time scales, on the order of several generations at the low end up to potentially thousands to millions of years,” Card stated. “I think with a lot of the tools that we’ve developed more recently, especially in things like genomics, people have taken a harder look at how quickly evolution can occur… And generally, when you see such an extreme thing occurring, it really suggests that there’s very strong selection. Something’s happening.”

Castoe thinks the importation of a lot of pythons from numerous various areas of Asia– all packaging in their biological baggage a wide array of hereditary variations, referred to as alleles, for their journey to North America– set the table for a fast hereditary adjustment. As Castoe put it: “If you’ve got a good amount of genetic variation, given strong selection, this can happen in a heartbeat. ‘If I’ve got the allele, what the hell am I waiting for? I ain’t waiting for nothing!'”

At a time when approximately 40% of Americans do decline the idea of development, the pythons that made it through the Big Freeze in Florida appear to think in it 100%. The take-home genomics message from the snakes is that development is genuine, it’s obviously taking place at blindingly quick speed, and it argues that the 2010 cold wave might have produced a subset of pythons much better able to make it through cold temperature levels– and therefore much better adjusted to spread out beyond the northern limits of its existing variety.


Excerpted from SLITHER: How Nature’s Most Maligned Creatures Illuminate Our World © 2025 Stephen S. Hall and reprinted by authorization from Grand Central Publishing/Hachette Book Group.

Stephen S. Hall has actually been reporting and blogging about the crossway of science and society for more than 40 years. In addition to many cover stories in the New York Times Magazine, where he likewise functioned as a story editor and contributing author, his work has actually appeared in The New Yorker, The Atlantic Monthly, National Geographic, New York Magazine, Wired, Science, Nature, Scientific American and more. Hall is likewise the author of 6 seriously well-known non-fiction books about modern science. Considering that 2007, he has actually acted as an accessory teacher of journalism at New York University.

Learn more

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

You May Also Like

About the Author: tech