
Ted Cruz vs. Wi-Fi hotspots
Cruz: Hotspot loaning might “censor kids’ exposure to conservative viewpoints.”
Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Ted Cruz(R-Texas)at a hearing on Tuesday, January 28, 2025.
Credit: Getty Images|Tom Williams
United States Senator Ted Cruz(R-Texas)is attempting to obstruct a strategy to disperse Wi-Fi hotspots to schoolchildren, declaring it will cause not being watched Internet use, threaten kids, and potentially limit kids’ direct exposure to conservative perspectives. “The government shouldn’t be complicit in harming students or impeding parents’ ability to decide what their kids see by subsidizing unsupervised access to inappropriate content,” Cruz stated.
Cruz, chairman of the Commerce Committee, the other day revealed a Congressional Review Act (CRA )resolution that would nullify the hotspot guideline released by the Federal Communications Commission. The FCC voted to embrace the guideline in July 2024 under then-Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel, stating it was required to assist kids without trusted Internet gain access to finish their research.
Cruz’s news release stated the FCC action “violates federal law, creates major risks for kids’ online safety, [and] harms parental rights.” While Rosenworcel stated in 2015 that the hotspot financing might be carried out under the Universal Service Fund’s existing budget plan, Cruz declared that it “will increase taxes on working families.”
“As adopted, the Biden administration’s Wi-Fi Hotspot Order unlawfully expanded the Universal Service Fund (USF) to subsidize Wi-Fi hotspots for off-campus use by schoolchildren, despite the Communications Act clearly limiting the Commission’s USF authority to ‘classrooms,'” Cruz’s statement stated. “This partisan order, strongly opposed by then-Commissioner Brendan Carr and Commissioner Nathan Simington, represents an overreach of the FCC’s mandate and poses serious risk to children’s online safety and parental rights.”
Cruz’s news release stated that “unlike in a classroom or study hall, off-premises hotspot use is not typically supervised, inviting exposure to inappropriate content, including social media.” Cruz’s workplace declared that the FCC program shifts control of Internet gain access to from moms and dads to schools and therefore “heightens the risk of censoring kids’ exposure to conservative viewpoints.”
The Cruz resolution to nullify the FCC guideline was co-sponsored by Sens. John Thune (R-S.D.), Roger Wicker (R-Miss.), Deb Fischer (R-Neb.), Jerry Moran (R-Kan.), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Todd Young (R-Ind.), Ted Budd (R-N.C.), Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.), John Curtis (R-Utah), Tim Sheehy (R-Mont.), Shelley Moore Capito (R-W. Va.), and Cynthia Lummis (R-Wyo.).
The FCC’s strategy
Under the CRA, Congress can reverse current firm actions. The specific due date isn’t constantly clear, however the Congressional Research Service approximated “that Biden Administration rules submitted to the House or Senate on or after August 1, 2024” are most likely to be based on the CRA throughout the very first couple of months of 2025. The FCC hotspot guideline was sent to Congress in August.
The FCC guideline broadens E-Rate, a Universal Service Fund program that assists schools and libraries get cost effective broadband. The hotspot order would let schools and libraries utilize E-Rate financing for “lending programs to loan Wi-Fi hotspots and services that can be used off-premises to the students, school staff, and library patrons with the greatest need,” the FCC states.
The FCC’s hotspot order stated “technology has become an integral part of the modern classroom,” which “neither Congress nor the Commission has defined the term ‘classroom’ or placed any explicit location restrictions on schools or libraries.”
“We conclude that funding Wi-Fi hotspots and services for off-premises use will help enhance access for school classrooms and libraries to the broadband connectivity necessary to facilitate digital learning for students and school staff, as well as library services for library patrons who lack broadband access when they are away from school or library premises,” the FCC order stated.
Off-premises usage can assist “the student who has no way of accessing their homework to prepare for the next day’s classroom lesson, or the school staff member who is unable to engage in parent-teacher meetings or professional trainings that take place after the school day ends, or the library patron who needs to attend a virtual job interview or perform bona fide research after their library’s operating hours,” the FCC stated.
The FCC order continued:
Hence, we conclude that by allowing assistance for the purchase of Wi-Fi hotspots and Internet cordless services that can be utilized off-premises and by enabling schools and libraries to utilize this innovation to link the people with the best requirement to the resources needed to totally take part in class projects and in accessing library services, we will thus extend the digital reach of schools and libraries for academic functions and permit schools, instructors, and libraries to embrace and utilize technology-based tools and supports that need Internet gain access to in the house. For these factors, we conclude that the action embraced today is within the scope of our statutory instruction under area 254(h)( 2 )(A) of the Communications Act to boost access to innovative telecoms and details services for school class and libraries.
The FCC order stated it would depend on schools and libraries “to make determinations about acceptable use in their communities.” Schools and libraries looking for financing would be “subject to the requirements under the Children’s Internet Protection Act, which requires local educational agencies and libraries to establish specific technical protections before allowing network access,” the FCC stated. They likewise need to accredit on an FCC type that they have actually upgraded and openly published appropriate usage policies and might be needed to supply the policies and proof of where they are published to the FCC.
Hotspots were dispersed throughout pandemic
The FCC formerly dispersed Wi-Fi hotspots and other Internet gain access to innovation through the $7.171 billion Emergency Connectivity Fund (ECF), which was licensed by Congress in the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Congress rescinded the program’s staying financing of $1.768 billion last year.
The Rosenworcel FCC reacted by adjusting E-Rate to consist of hotspot financing. General E-Rate financing is based upon need and topped at $4.94 billion annually. Real costs for E-Rate in 2023 was $2.48 billion. E-Rate and other Universal Service Fund programs are spent for through costs troubled telephone company, which normally pass that expense on to customers with a “Universal Service” charge on telephone costs.
Carr, who is now FCC chairman, stated in his July 2024 dissent that just Congress can choose whether to restore the hotspot financing. “Now that the ECF program has expired, its future is up to Congress,” he stated. “The legislative branch retains the power to decide whether to continue funding this Wi-Fi loaner program—or not. But Congress has made clear that the FCC’s authority to fund this initiative is over.”
With the previous short-term program, Congress made sure that Universal Service Fund cash would not be invested in the Wi-Fi hotspots which “the program would sunset when the COVID-19 emergency ended,” Carr stated. The replacement program does not have the “guardrails” enforced by Congress, he argued.
“The FCC includes no limit on the amount of ratepayer dollars that can be expended in aggregate over the course of years, no limit on the locations at which the hotpots can be used, no sunset date on the program, and no protection against this program increasing consumers’ monthly bills,” Carr stated.
Even if Congress does not act upon Cruz’s resolution, Carr might begin a brand-new FCC continuing to reverse the previous choice. Carr has actually stated he prepares to act “to reverse the last administration’s costly regulatory overreach.”
Ex-chair stated strategy didn’t need budget plan boost
Rosenworcel stated the short-lived program “demonstrated what a modern library and school can do to help a community learn without limits and keep connected.”
“Today we have a choice,” she stated at the time. “We can go back to those days when people sat in parking lots to get a signal to get online and students struggling with the homework gap hung around fast food places just to get the Internet access they needed to do their schoolwork. Or we can go forward and build a digital future that works for everyone.”
She argued that the FCC has authority since the law “directs the agency to update the definition of universal service, which includes E-Rate, so that it evolves over time,” and “Congress specifically directed the Commission to designate additional services in this program as needed for schools and libraries.”
Cruz’s news release stated the FCC “order imposes no overall limit on the amount of federal dollars that can be expended on the hotspots, lacks mean-testing to target children who may not have Internet at home, and allows for duplication of service in areas where the federal government is already subsidizing broadband. As a result, the order could strain the USF while increasing the risk of waste, fraud, and abuse.”
Rosenworcel stated the program would work “within the existing E-Rate budget” and hence “does not require new universal service funds nor does it come at the cost of the support E-Rate provides to connectivity in schools and libraries.” Resolving the spending plan, the FCC order mentioned that E-Rate need has actually disappointed the program’s financing cap for several years.
While there would not be compulsory mean-testing, the FCC program would depend on schools and libraries to identify who ought to be admitted to hotspots. “In establishing a budgeted approach to the lending program mechanism, we expect that the limited number of available Wi-Fi hotspots will more naturally be targeted to students, school staff, or library patrons with the most need,” the FCC order stated.
Jon is a Senior IT Reporter for Ars Technica. He covers the telecom market, Federal Communications Commission rulemakings, high speed customer affairs, lawsuit, and federal government guideline of the tech market.
86 Comments
Find out more
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.