As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Mount Everest is the world’s highest mountain as determined from water levelWill it hold that title permanently?

To address this concern, initially we need to comprehend how mountains form and how Mount Everest and the rest of the Himalayas got so high. One method high mountains form is when 2 tectonic plates clash. As one starts to subduct– or move under– the other, crust gets mushed around, upheaved, and became mountains.

According to Rob Butlera geologist at the University of Aberdeen in Scotland, the heights of the mountains that form throughout these crashes depend upon numerous aspects. These attributes consist of the density of the crust, which is identified by the strength and length of the tectonic accident, and the crust’s temperature level, which is figured out by its age.

“Think of the crust not as a solid, but as a viscous liquid, like maple syrup,” Butler informed Live Science. Like cold maple syrup, cold crust is more thick and, for that reason, firmer. Thicker, chillier crust can form taller mountains than thinner, warmer crust can.

Aside from the density and temperature level of the crust, the most essential consider identifying the height and development of mountains is disintegration.

Related: What’s the earliest range of mountains on the planet?( How about the youngest? )

“It’s because erosion is so effective that [the Himalayas] are one of the fastest rising systems of rocks on the planet,” Butler stated. This is due to the fact that of a concept called isostasy. Similar to a container ship drifting in the ocean, the less product that’s stacked in the world’s crust, the greater it drifts above the mantle, the world’s middle layer.

The more product that is transferred away from a mountain– whether by means of a river, a glacier or heavy rains and landslides– the more the mountains around it can increase. A 2024 research study discovered that the fast disintegration of a river network more than 45 miles (72 kilometers) from Mount Everest assisted the peak grow in between 49 and 164 feet (15 and 50 meters) in the previous 89,000 years.

Disintegration is one aspect in mountains’ development, it is likewise part of what triggers them to diminish, discussed Matthew Foxco-author of the research study and a geologist at University College London. “[Whether mountains grow or shrink] depends on this balance between the rates of erosion and the rates of uplift,” Fox informed Live Science. If the rate of uplift is greater, the mountain will grow. If the rate of disintegration is greater, the mountain will diminish.

Some researchers have actually recommended that Nanga Parbat, among Everest’s Himalayan next-door neighbors and the ninth-tallest mountain in the world, is growing quick enough to one day surpass Everest in height. Butler and Fox doubt this will occur. Nanga Parbat is growing quicker than Everest due to fast disintegration, it is likewise deteriorating much faster due to the strength of monsoons in that location. On the other hand, Everest is growing and wearing down more gradually, leaving it at a relatively continuous 2,000 feet (610 m) taller than Nanga Parbat.

Butler does not mark down the possibility that another Himalayan mountain might take the throne sooner or later. Weather condition aspects might alter gradually, he stated, triggering shifts in the peaks’ development rates. “[Tectonic collision in the Himalayas] is going to continue for another 10 million years,” Butler stated. “There’s plenty of time to juggle these variables around a bit.”

Butler believes it’s not likely there will ever be a peak considerably taller than Everest. The Himalayas being in the sweet area; they formed due to an extremely extreme and long accident occasion with cold crust and high disintegration rates due to monsoons. They were likewise penned in by surrounding range of mountains, leaving little space for the crust to get away throughout the accident.

“If you squash things, they’ve got to go up or sideways,” Butler informed Live Science. “And when sideways is taken, they’ve got nowhere to go but up.”

It’s really unusual for all of these aspects to line up, Butler stated, and it may not have actually taken place before the Himalayas. On Earth, gravity is too effective to enable a mountain to get much taller than Everest’s present height.

“If we’re talking a few meters, or even a few hundred meters, there’s every possibility that another mountain could overtake Everest,” Butler informed Live Science. “But in terms of doing something significant, like peaks that are 10 kilometers [6 miles] high, I would think probably not.”

Katherine Irving is a freelance science reporter focusing on wildlife and the geosciences. After finishing from Macalester College, where she composed movie scripts, excavated dinosaur bones and immunized wolves, Katherine dove directly into internships withScience MagazineandThe ScientistShe now adds to theScience Magazinepodcast and enjoys reporting about the stunning complexities of our world.

Many Popular

Find out more